- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old+ J5 a; E. {7 S; s' ?& y0 u
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical5 D' c& [: |; ]9 A# f
Exposure to Testosterone
3 [, C8 _/ N6 } }" Z4 _Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
1 P m$ A! f6 Q$ |) W- oand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
7 h/ X5 {+ [& ]Clinical Pediatrics
( {* [6 ]% Y+ ~; U4 B4 m. H/ B6 WVolume 46 Number 6% `9 I- m) f- G) i, z3 O$ U
July 2007 540-543% [1 B# w* X% K# @" q8 A
© 2007 Sage Publications* @+ u/ z! X, y5 v8 H- o
10.1177/0009922806296651
- ~0 u: ]" |6 O2 v3 A0 Khttp://clp.sagepub.com
/ o9 }% F8 V+ ~1 g h% P$ Ihosted at6 g }) Z6 V+ C K) o' M
http://online.sagepub.com
8 m8 K4 [3 C. g" q( y1 aPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,9 [7 ~ `" F# i0 D. b3 J% B- G
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
+ D* k. ~9 B8 J7 X& Tprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
& M) n$ Z& Y, |6 S, q( p+ }& v nthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has4 J% ~6 e( a$ ^& d) m
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system
% c [6 C& N1 n% `lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested' U2 L* Z. s+ [+ c& k6 v, B) O
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic' c; X- i% i# L2 L- M0 E
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-: c( g [% w5 K) t
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We* }( X2 g+ G! ?
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
& g2 Q3 o3 F% L0 n3 H; E! O% {enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-6 D3 [# J, R( d2 l9 b
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
; v, n2 l/ J; Z" `( G& r1 G* |to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
6 p- T3 |% O$ c; \) Y8 Othe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
9 r; u* b/ g5 Y& P8 Y( `2 Y9 Kmation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this0 A# z9 b& A$ a* H: W* W" u
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of( t) w; @4 B/ B6 u% u
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-+ [. |- \( s* ~
bly more common than the rare case report in the% _" t' _' ?5 h* O" g+ R. ]
literature.4
) g$ |- |2 j2 w& P0 }2 }' iPatient Report2 W, h- Q; R" D8 `4 L* r5 |
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the3 i2 }4 I! R% W
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern5 q( q/ P( d8 B- \& e m
of early sexual development. His mother noticed- |% f$ n) s4 s" o1 `
light colored pubic hair development when he was
3 j) t, z9 a" R- L* [From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of
+ g+ O' a q$ w# b; e6 S* CSouth Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.# w: G, i9 O# ^% V- v+ {0 q
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,8 P$ |) O9 O) k9 v
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
: K3 m3 }1 ` b) t/ XMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;9 j: {& n5 X2 E: I, Y+ M
e-mail: [email protected].
' P- b I& C) Q& F: V; n' sabout 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
( A& |' R9 |+ w: Tdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
) k) o- X! k+ U0 q- C* N9 R4 lment of his penis and frequent erections. The child% A) l. J6 X+ o! C
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with s" S( k) K: U* j# P0 v
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
% G6 I5 G9 Q5 G20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year; Z. R/ \; a8 a; Y* m, L5 ?
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with9 l# L7 t( |( I8 K" a+ Z. t
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,/ Y4 g5 Y: C$ c' V' Q
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
+ T/ X( A( g: [% p( iwas age appropriate.. Y- T( j6 I0 x" @
The family history was remarkable for the father,
9 b" P- V1 [$ a/ c! }6 iwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
. @ h7 a8 k$ F/ x6 Ywhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
, |! ] g6 T: @+ R" i0 @; Mheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat( Z' N! X" Z8 O, {/ L
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
( K- e7 ^1 n. T0 |3 |7 QThe father denied taking any other medication. The6 _0 j/ l& g# F: W& a7 K
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche* h' h9 a0 Y" g7 W- V1 @' c! N! _
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet- |; ?- B5 A" K- x
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-, d, w* u, {$ Z6 X
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-$ A5 P; x% w: f+ P; e& w
tives. There were no siblings.
! m8 `( K7 M. _, T* f6 E& N) rPhysical Examination8 }- s" M _( @
The physical examination revealed a very active,; p6 b d$ p- }; p
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
+ c" ^0 o" h" e+ I4 N; Ya blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
$ j* z) R- E x( P90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
3 V* E/ ^1 B) d(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth$ @0 n& N$ T5 P, I Y) x9 ], l
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
7 W- J, V4 j9 {0 _% ythe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
/ P: R; H3 Y. [- \The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
! Z9 T+ [. J% b+ k0 `! {5 t: n$ Jenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
9 M/ m) y3 Q7 {5 Q/ }! b" ^- E8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
4 }2 \1 U5 b- R$ V' Udeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
9 [4 N/ L$ A4 ?. I ^1 ?540, W N ^5 P+ W
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from& B+ H5 p: V& k5 g8 {( t! ^
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The+ D$ B4 N2 `% g5 y. a
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.5 M$ _. [6 W% }) d: j* Y7 H0 R
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
' V/ V0 C u7 T' P& j! ]oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
% Y$ ^+ K M6 j$ u! a" I$ K# d2 nabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.& r9 }4 h4 U0 B. }/ K
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+' A$ B" `8 e) k4 j' B
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
- b; M& Y3 y# M2 C: J4 @of papilledema.9 r4 N, u3 W. E5 C1 s3 U' j
Laboratory Evaluation
; o! K& h6 v, y; A1 k1 x9 _The bone age was consistent with 28 months by1 Z! i, T) \6 ?$ v: y2 Y" T$ o
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-- j& b7 o0 i# V' P9 L
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
: f, R$ s) F) d+ k& @' Nkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test" i ?, t/ _3 N0 M: k- Y6 x/ ~$ M
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-4 X: a) b. _; }( h. U0 q
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).7 x! P6 Z: s/ p1 l5 ?* ~4 _
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood1 J, ^- ^4 @4 L+ z. o0 x T3 r
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were
) e A" b$ d. pwithin normal range for his age. The concentration
* L8 v4 l* Y. J- h' ?of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
7 z5 \( H9 g& R- t$ C2 s(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
9 }9 G, l7 k' v! P \% x8 a5 a! r' Eng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-' S% q) {+ R( L9 I% A, M
terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
8 V2 ~/ }* N5 Q+ N; ]desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
4 K9 {; V0 U9 C( ]/ y49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
6 P9 B0 B+ i' m3 e$ H/ q8 I& q) C4 |was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-! D' F* |0 O; K: b/ `
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
, k/ u/ S# ]) u& atestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),% B, x% h3 E2 O8 X3 j
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
* _1 @1 \* N8 Z( n5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
! I* T1 A: @2 } `8 ?" A, sstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
1 K7 ^0 M0 E0 g8 t sconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL5 t7 Y; B# {4 u7 g
(prepubertal).' { y1 w4 n; v0 m
The parents were notified about the laboratory
6 z- K" W" i' n( q4 B, ?- t9 D8 V) Jresults and were informed that all of the tests were8 I# r" m1 z+ j% v
normal except the testosterone level was high. The1 H2 | u8 r2 ]% Z+ A
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to
9 m8 b$ K/ B, J% F, e5 S, Gobtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-. x. b1 J; B$ i* f$ R$ g% `. j& M: I
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
" q/ W2 k( t2 j XPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
6 q- l% R* _, P' v5 T5 fchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained; @/ u# t( E/ Y. G$ n- d
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained5 j8 r. K& B) t/ R2 L
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-0 b7 U- f' G* t) G* b6 y8 P0 K6 s
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
2 ~" k+ A, E q1 W' Othe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2. h1 K( `6 a3 L6 r1 M4 C8 ?, j$ Y
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
9 b1 ~$ X- }) b! A1 F- }The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-
A) L! E4 _& _ G. g- Ning frequent erections.
* q9 ^4 k( P+ Z# O* U) w X3 NBoth parents were again questioned about use of2 a2 {0 Q5 Z$ i
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to+ V# O. P% }; l1 J/ ~
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
, t$ Q2 J# `& H/ Y e% x3 g( ETopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
B% v- g" E1 g! Cuse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
( m7 R2 _2 M% Zing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
# V/ H1 G$ o! d) r9 qa year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed k9 e5 ^/ {. f9 a' E: D
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
. ]7 D8 i% C/ d1 Iscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
0 S `; e, g* f# H& ?1 e; [1 k0 H& Ksecondary to depression.
. J |4 {7 j+ nThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
4 q+ ~# E J8 y+ ]2 q2 e' ^The father would hug the baby and hold him on his; ~) X# R3 Y2 q ~
chest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-0 Z+ q. K J) [+ Q
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.. o9 D' b2 v, `5 k
The father also admitted that after the phone call,7 R4 V$ W* }# @" P! B' Z$ ?- F3 B( D
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby" U' R+ t( S4 T0 H) R, Y
was high, he then read the product information1 A# T8 Z8 w. r! C7 S
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-0 M c! r) n7 ]* i' x( k" A
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
; Z' U% a/ W C" H$ M) c2 J8 g' Adecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the% o, b& |$ H: Q/ B8 ?. l
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
w: T" Z I# s+ M6 v, Gbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
1 Y- [. a3 J; j, b$ s' dtest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
% t6 l9 w7 k/ Z w; d# vlaboratory to obtain the test., h. M. F9 i9 a0 M, t7 L
Discussion
k! Q5 P9 `/ l4 H$ M6 jPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
; G9 d" G9 h' F# {sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4 n. A0 q) M. X, v* B' c! }
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
; e# n; o# P! k0 b8 z+ Mit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-( z Z& W! }8 o0 r. _4 W' c. I! D
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
F+ l. n$ ?+ q# B! Omon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
8 {, X8 ~1 B) q: g0 vmay have a central nervous system lesion that is
( J/ V8 K+ o$ b8 U8 nresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
; {+ Y3 k, ^% P# [amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
9 A: Q- i) H5 k8 j+ g$ esis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in# C% S1 b0 K8 ^( U- \5 `( g
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
) V& u" Y9 Y5 V( a3 q" sization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
- K& P; `. w3 A' ^3 r& irical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by4 Y8 h$ Z) J2 r9 i
gonadotropins.1,3
$ }1 ], f) d) o* V7 JGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
9 ^6 c0 U1 P$ M8 K$ hcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
4 L! _" _. W) e: Bandrogenic stimulation from either endogenous or
$ m* Y* g* b( J3 v" Mexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
9 f& C: W; N3 }. O: y: Rulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing0 n& H3 a& e4 p$ F+ r
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
) h; V, J) _0 i: o0 ?. g7 _- nadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
, k0 s2 y' Y2 p1 Y' tpuberty in boys.3,4
( K4 i2 y$ N' \) T0 Y7 n3 f- eThe most common form of congenital adrenal8 v0 p4 k E9 q0 r3 v, |
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
! j5 L2 m7 o' e! r. rThe 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in! A( c- n0 w+ }, g
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,2 l6 l4 a, \( _
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
. K2 U3 r3 h6 z0 [" O4 W" zexcess.1,3
3 U- N) I/ E! M; a* Y) oat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from: t% i/ r$ J3 c9 c: z
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007+ B# V* q. {6 P3 y7 x% W, p+ ^
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-+ e) k* D( l) ?! V
independent precocious puberty, which is also known
# ]4 N6 e. D/ h T/ y p3 Nas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a' X8 v: j/ Q( L0 w& m% s
very young age. The physical findings in these boys* y4 _) ^8 d. c3 h' K R
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
8 ~. Y3 U8 Y7 \0 m7 G6 c. ]+ C: }including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys% k. q# e B$ }# |) V- V/ |' @ _
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder e" b0 ?+ X; X, W% \
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
) Q) q) [1 ^- Y5 h3 b! gpubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin- V8 X* Y3 u" V
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked7 c3 W% J" O7 H( a! I3 Z6 d& b# E7 o+ w
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only
0 K5 u" f r. k7 a2 {males; therefore, other male members of the family
+ O5 J+ W5 ^, b+ L7 `4 s- Hmay have similar precocious puberty.3
- V# m/ C, A+ F. x" p9 l9 cIn our patient, physical examination was incon-
! O: ]/ d d* e8 c. h+ w$ rsistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-5 { b: z! q$ ~
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
& ], {& u( ?1 n9 L' e3 f& _was in the differential diagnosis because his father
, y- \8 X+ U3 e& pstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally," C u* F/ o3 ^
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
* a* y. T+ n6 Rbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-& Q& B' `6 a$ w& w3 v* j3 c
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
" ]& T! D+ R" A* obiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,6 F4 U/ X1 n r' D8 x
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase1 M- q$ c4 C" s% P. Q! ~1 ~
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-2 _5 ]5 y% t4 D8 X
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
) k1 R# y& N% X8 l: @8 v6 c7 lThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly# S: @( R8 P: m4 G' ]
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because. _* {& I' ?' C* c$ [4 z+ L8 ? ]
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
- \# L. [2 N2 G" Z* X7 H; Qpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
) f) q) \- F1 L& @3 ?- l8 mdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-2 e1 ?$ V! k; Y4 m! _
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
6 S6 @% F! t& |; J$ musing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
7 L, \, S/ d+ L3 f2 @$ q4 m( m" [1 uDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or# ?6 B0 n" D. [8 M/ k
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
: c. A! ~6 w; p! a0 runprotected females through direct skin exposure.% v; S, d# B& Q9 ?
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the# p+ i" U, ?9 r# R
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
( @9 }0 S* c8 F8 o% l# @, l1 X; qeven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male7 n8 C" {9 D9 @" p& i4 U
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-2 U. s e' ^2 J% ~8 S2 W
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.9 R7 P* ?5 v6 b( D
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
- J) [) p1 m! o, Xwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that7 Q( w- S( \; {' C( S* Q/ i* o8 O
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
2 X6 }$ ~& Z6 _7 f5 nterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
. C( x* y. g6 k- h2 Y* factive in young children exposed to testosterone
- x3 L. ^' a: Pexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-. }" e4 s+ d) A+ U' u
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
: [0 O. E- L0 ]; _# p$ G) }. Dvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
7 q2 ?' k( D& |+ l; X' {children results in an increase in growth velocity and( B" u$ Q+ ?( O8 u
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.1 E* C3 |* K+ \& g9 A" k$ z" R5 r- {1 i
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during
9 B9 h' ~. B: G# u! aearly childhood on pubertal development and final
% l1 g3 o1 G1 s& `) Oadult height are not fully known and always remain$ V7 X# w5 K1 [ E8 x# J
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-$ w4 X" W9 I; a5 a) ]3 g
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some$ u. [( T0 G( f& `4 P$ w
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
) H( L5 F! P) N. Hcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
# j6 p3 M2 x; D& j! Ndecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
6 ^7 d) f C* B, y2 UThere are conflicting reports and controversy' k, S! m; V; T- a1 c" ~, h* I
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult- h' B0 ~9 R( R- q/ f9 x I! [
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
3 ], t- o" N- t+ V; z% \" D5 v s3 \adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-5 j/ A9 ~+ r0 W3 j' j" ]
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,
* C. o- N6 T6 V( u1 k+ r3 JSutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
9 D5 @; g5 b1 c( O8 Dchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
5 q+ f3 m& b i# S' mpenile length in clinical studies.
1 C" d, R# l! q8 S: ^9 INonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
' R( N I# L# x; x, m% Igoing to experience any of the untoward effects from
/ v' Q- f9 e# p# ?( x! B- Ctestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
6 W; N; d5 ~7 N0 u# D5 [the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.
* f- V& k2 X! b' C9 SAlthough the bone age was advanced at the time of$ R* J6 Y/ o4 c1 q+ J, Q, |
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at
+ N0 p2 ~2 `% C2 L+ a) M, N3 f0 z# bthe follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult- B7 n, A: u e
height will not be affected.
0 F+ e2 i: I$ q/ M+ yAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-$ r% }6 s* C0 N1 Q
ability of androgen products in our society may' E. T( {' U/ G7 Z$ i
indeed cause more virilization in male or female
0 Y1 q$ l- V* E* u' `) `( B6 Pchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-4 ?- H0 [3 ^5 ~. m4 ^
gen products must be considered and specific ques-
- C8 X( r# _3 ntioning about the use of a testosterone product or
7 j- l/ A7 M, A/ Z( a G, sgel should be asked of the family members during# Z) {- K$ H4 G& w' B) `# C" J
the evaluation of any children who present with vir-: a( i; P( r/ M
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-7 I' }+ ^/ F3 W# \7 c! c8 g, O
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
- O5 R. A+ k3 G- O9 e8 D. Gappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a i6 W, H/ i& ~; a& }7 _# s E
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
/ \7 a9 h9 f6 J' y5 i' V; z5 F! ^result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
2 z* L& E) L- d% v/ `7 T9 xinvestigation. The primary care physician should be0 S: J: L9 K* W6 W
aware of this fact, because most of these children
5 R: x$ S, q& J/ V7 [may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
0 J% ]; J$ s4 ~7 I" @# y. x- gDesk Reference and package insert should also put a6 X# U/ X4 x* e* ?% w" s
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
' r4 i- U& b+ V E5 g5 K+ Sfemale child who might come in contact with some-) N2 {* c; j/ m2 K6 w" v: o
one using any of these products.2 L- S' i4 W! n5 q0 s
References# m4 B7 E- e8 Y9 k$ `, |6 n; b
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation9 |( u/ M4 ^. Y
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
N: `$ [/ e: xEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
a) w" z4 V) u& j; Q# e; D( S2002: 565-628.% O. Z; C5 ^! e4 Z7 T6 O4 B( O
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious' j0 @* f- t% A' K2 ~1 H! ^( c
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|